Audiblox seems to combine both OT
Posted by Colleen on June 7, 2006, 6:53 am, in reply
to "Audiblox seems to combine both OT and speech therapy in one,
plus many other therapies"
Hi Jenny,
I live in Sydney and started my then 7-year-old on Audiblox
in Jan 2005. Audiblox is still a work in progress for us.
In 2004 he was dubbed a slow learner after an IQ test.
More digging showed up he has multiple weakness with visual spatial skills
(bottom 1% for his age); visual motor planning (handwriting) and mild
language problems. Most significantly he has a poor working memory, especially
his auditory working memory. Not surprisingly school wasn't his favourite
place and he still struggles to concentrate in noisy classrooms.
I started Audiblox because despite 7 months of specialised
help for two hours a week with reading (using a phonics based programme),
spelling and handwriting, his progress was slow and he was not catching
up. At the start of Audiblox his reading was still 9 months behind his
age group in year 1. Within three months of starting Audiblox his year
2 special ed. teacher at school said whatever I was doing was working
and they eventually discontinued including him with the L.D. school reading
programme. Note: They don't do reading recovery at his school. By September
2005, end of year two, he was considered to be in the normal range for
reading, whatever that means. We are still doing the reading programme
and 18 months after starting we are close to completing the 3rd chapter
of the book rainbow dreams. Note: in 12 months my sons visual spatial
scores improved dramatically. He started with a standardised score of
66 in Jan 2005 and then improved to 96 in Dec 2005, with 100 being average,
all thanks to Audiblox.
Now the focus is on accelerating his reading and language
comprehension (the language problem is acting as a brake on his progress).
I was slow to follow the strategy suggested by the programme for children
with language problems so it is too early to see any difference. I admit
I find it difficult to incorporate that part of the programme on top of
everything else (it involves playing taped stories). I do 1-1.5 hours
per day. I also use the reading programme as an opportunity to discuss
different word meanings and word combinations. It does disrupt the programme
and makes it take longer than an hour but it provides an opportunity to
work on language skills.
Audiblox has definitely helped my son's spelling. In year
1 he just couldn't remember to spell the most basic words even after practicing
all week. There are still lots of words he can't spell but his ability
to learn words of 5 to 8 letters has accelerated and he is better at retaining
them.
He still has a problem with written output. We saw over
the last year a slow decline in the number of letter reversals but his
handwriting is messy and not automating even though his fine motor skills
have improved on re-testing (103 standardised score). He still has to
stop to think how to form letters. I recently took him to an O.T. as when
I try to add in the handwriting component out of the disgraphia programme
he has a melt down. It takes him 20 minutes to complete the 5-minute exercise
badly. I'm hoping he'll have a change of heart and try the programme during
the week. I have showed the programme to a couple of O.T.'s and they think
it would help him.
I won't pretend Audiblox has been easy to follow through
with, as my son is not a willing participant. It has been a case of dogged
persistence in the face of persistent resistance. I know Audiblox has
helped him. I do think that its' success is due to the regularity with
which it is done, i.e. 1 hour 5 days a week for the first 10 months. Circumstances
caused a period of disruption to the programme but I did not notice any
regression resulting from this. This year we do 4-5 days per week. Either
½ hour or 1 hour depending on what we can fit in. The difference is last
year I did not make him do school homework except spelling. This year
(3) I am doing school homework plus sport, making the week a bit crowded
at times. I now try to fit the 1-hour reading programme in before school
but sometimes we don't make it right though.
All up I'd recommend the programme. I can see it has helped
in all sorts of ways other than just reading.
Good Luck
Colleen
|